Welcome to the Community Forum!
discussion
R
Ralph Matthews
Beth, my first reaction to your comment was that the peer reviewed information was well worth the difficulties and inability to access the library information and that as time went on the technical support would improve with constructive critique from users. However, after several submissions and requests to improve access to the library information with absolutely no results, I M now inclined to agree with you. As a physician, I hoped to recommend this app to friends, family and patients so they would be able to review the science but the app fails miserably and tech support is inadequate and should be an embarrassment to Dr. Roizen and the Cleveland Clinic.
Come on guys you have put a lot of thought and work into assembling peer reviewed data only to let it flounder in being inaccessible to those of us who coughed up the $300 to obtain inaccessiblility!
b
beth kushner
My thoughts are that this is a terrible waste. The app does not work as represented. The content is missing. Technical support is non-existent. I will discourage anyone from using this and Dr Roizen should be embarrassed to associate with this.
B
Bonnie Neeley
beth kushner: I agree that the execution of the app leaves a lot to be desired. I have given up on trying to use the tracking. Some of the info is new and interesting and seems to be backed by peer reviewed science . It would be nice to be able to access the recipes after they appear once in a lesson.
C
Charlie Potthoff
discussion